by FJP Law Offices | May 9, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
NOT REMOVING A THIRD PARTY DOES NOT RESULT IN THE LAWSUIT BEING DECLARED INADMISSBLE AS A WHOLE NOT REMOVING A THIRD PARTY DOES NOT RESULT IN THE LAWSUIT BEING DECLARED INADMISSBLE AS A WHOLE Not removing a third party does not result in the lawsuit being declared...
by FJP Law Offices | May 9, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
DUTCH HOOGE RAAD (SUPREME COURT) DECISION ON ABORTUS The Hoge Raad said in this arrest that for the intentional abortion of a living womb, it is enough that the woman who had the abortion suspected that the child in her womb was still alive. The question of whether...
by FJP Law Offices | May 5, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
THE EXECUTOR (THE TOOL) IS NOT THE DOER AND CANNOT BE CRIMINALIZED The person who orders the action is called a vigeur (power) in the Penal Code, and they are regular perpetrators in the Netherlands. Examples cited by Remmelink in his conclusion on the judgment of 18...
by FJP Law Offices | May 5, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
“THE PARTY WHO HAS THE CAPACITY TO SUBMIT A CLAIM” Only those with legal relations and interest in the disputed matter can file a claim in a civil case. → Supreme Court Decision No. 2961K/Pdt/1993, dated 28 May 1998. Source: Varia Peradilan No. 290,...
by FJP Law Offices | May 5, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
“An educated person must have done justice in thought, especially in deed.” Pramoedya Ananta Toer, Bumi Manusia, 1975 Best regards, Fredrik J. Pinakunary