Today’s Legal Enlightenment (Sunday, January 2, 2022)-CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION REGARDING ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AND/OR ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS AS EVIDENCE

Article 5 paragraphs 1 and 2 as well as Article 44 letter b of the ITE Law and Article 26A of the Anti-Corruption Law do not clearly regulate wiretapping including recording which is electronic information and/or electronic document as legal evidence. The Constitutional Court decided that the phrase “electronic information and/or electronic documents” in Article aquo must be interpreted as evidence carried out in the context of law enforcement AT THE REQUEST OF THE POLICE, PROSECUTORS and/or other Law Enforcement institutions stipulated by law as stipulated in Article 31 paragraph (3) ITE Law.

Constitutional Court Decision No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016 dated September 7, 2016

Regards,

Fredrik J. Pinakunary