by FJP Law Offices | May 9, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
CLAIM AGAINST THE STATE THAT CONFISCATED EVIDENCE A third party with good faith who objects to the decision of a criminal judge who, for state evidence, confiscated a land that they think belongs to them and does not belong to the defendant in a corruption case can...
by FJP Law Offices | May 9, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
THE LAWSUIT IS INADMISSIBLE BECAUSE THE OBJECT OF THE DISPUTE AND THE DEFENDANT ARE DIFFERENT Whereas in a Civil lawsuit where the object of the case and the Defendant are different, the lawsuit must be filed separately against each object of the dispute and the...
by FJP Law Offices | May 9, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
THE CLAIM WAS UNCLEAR BECAUSE THE PETITUM WAS NOT SUPPORTED BY A CLEAR FACTUAL GROUND (POSITA) Petitum/claim in a civil lawsuit must be based on and supported by the positum/arguments clearly described in the claim so that it appears that there is a connection between...
by FJP Law Offices | May 9, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
IF PROVEN TO HAVE VIOLATED THE LAW, CIVIL LIABILITY CAN NOT BE REMOVED EVEN IF THE DEFENDANT HAS A BUSINESS LICENSE In the case of Review to the Supreme Court (Review) between the Ministry of Environment as the Plaintiff/Petitioner for Judicial Review against PT Surya...
by FJP Law Offices | May 9, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
THE COMPANY IS DEEMED TO RECOGNIZE AGREEMENTS MADE PERSONALLY BY THE COMPANY’S MANAGEMENT An agreement made personally by the company’s management, which is then carried out/implemented by the company and has taken advantage of, is deemed recognized and justified by...