by FJP Law Offices | Sep 11, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom. –Thomas Jefferson Regards, Fredrik J Pinakunary
by FJP Law Offices | Sep 11, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
COURT DECISIONS MUST CONSIDER THE EVIDENCE OF BOTH PARTIES “The decisions of the Cassation and High Court which do not consider the evidence of both parties are insufficient and must be annulled”; Article 164 HIR: Valid evidence according to civil...
by FJP Law Offices | Sep 11, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
IF THE POLICY INSURER IS NOT ABLE TO PROVE THE CAUSE FOR REJECTION INCLUDING IN THE EXCEPTION OF THE INSURANCE AGREEMENT THEN THE INSURER MUST PAY FOR THE INSURED’S INSURANCE POLICY The Supreme Court stated that the Defendant (Insurer) had defaulted by refusing...
by FJP Law Offices | Sep 11, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
THE BURNING OF THE CREDIT RECIPIENT’S STOCK OF MERCHANDISE DOES NOT ELIMINATE OR REDUCE THEIR OBLIGATIONS SPECIFIED IN THE CREDIT AGREEMENT The Supreme Court stated that the reason why the Cassation Respondent/Plaintiff did not pay off his debt (credit) due to...
by FJP Law Offices | Sep 11, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
THE DETERMINATION OF WHO IS THE OWNER OF THE EX RvE VERP LAND MUST BE TRIED FIRST IN THE GENERAL COURT, NOT DIRECTLY TO THE PTUN Bearing in mind that in this case the Plaintiff is concerned about the ‘ownership dispute’ of land ex RvE Verp No. 13886, then...