by FJP Law Offices | Sep 22, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people. – Eleanor Roosevelt Regards, Fredrik J. Pinakunary
by FJP Law Offices | Sep 14, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
Judges’ freedom is limited by accountability, integrity, morals, ethics, transparency, supervision, professionalism and impartiality. — Dwiarso Budi Santiarto Deputy Chief of Supervision of the Supreme Court, Regards,Fredrik J....
by FJP Law Offices | Sep 14, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
MK: “THE PROSECUTOR’S AUTHORITY TO APPLY FOR REVIEW IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL” Additional prosecutor’s authority to submit a Judicial Review (PK) as regulated in Article 30C letter h and Elucidation to Article 30C letter h of Law Number 11 of 2021...
by FJP Law Offices | Sep 12, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
PAYMENT FOR A PROJECT BEFORE THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED IS NOT A STATE LOSS AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ANY ELEMENT OF UNLAWFUL OR ABUSE OF AUTHORITY Regarding this issue, the Supreme Court has consistently held that full payment for work even though the work has not been...
by FJP Law Offices | Sep 12, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
THE EVIDENCE SEIZED DOES NOT BELONG TO THE DEFENDANT – RATIO DECIDENDI STATUS OF EVIDENCE The panel of judges for judicial review confirmed the PK’s reasons. The consideration is that in the decision of the Rengat District Court, the Panel of Judges did...
by FJP Law Offices | Sep 12, 2023 | Legal Enlightenment
REVIEW WAS APPROVED FOR NOVUM REASONS – PHENOMENAL CASES (SENGKON AND KARTA) The first successful PK application based on novum was the decision in the Sengkon and Karta cases. In this case, the public prosecutor accused Sengkon and Karta of killing Sulaiman and...