{"id":32147,"date":"2023-05-05T12:23:39","date_gmt":"2023-05-05T05:23:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/?p=32147"},"modified":"2023-05-05T12:24:18","modified_gmt":"2023-05-05T05:24:18","slug":"pencerahan-hukum-hari-ini-jumat-05-mei-2023","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/pencerahan-hukum-hari-ini-jumat-05-mei-2023\/","title":{"rendered":"Pencerahan Hukum Hari Ini (Jumat, 05 Mei 2023)"},"content":{"rendered":"<div dir=\"auto\">EKSEPSI KOMPETENSI PENGADILAN SEBAGAI ALASAN KASASI*<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">Eksepsi Kompetensi Relatif Pengadilan Negeri oleh Pemohon Kasasi diajukan sebagai \u201cKeberatan Kasasi\u201d, karena hal tersebut telah dilanggar Judex facti. Keberatan ini tidak dapat diterima oleh Mahkamah Agung, dengan alasan: menurut Pasal 133 HIR, eksepsi tersebut harus diajukan pada jawaban Tergugat dalam sidang di Pengadilan Negeri.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">\u2192 Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.1340 K\/Sip\/1971, tanggal 13 September 1972.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">Sumber:<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">Buku Kumpulan Kaidah Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Tahun 1953-2008 Berdasarkan Penggolongannya (hal. 169) oleh Hulman Panjaitan, S.H., M.H., (\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/repository.uki.ac.id\/2639\/2\/bukuputusanMARI.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?q=http:\/\/repository.uki.ac.id\/2639\/2\/bukuputusanMARI.pdf&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1683348092697000&amp;usg=AOvVaw1CW-ReTDScDV-b1IUnBsrF\">http:\/\/repository.uki.ac.id\/<wbr \/>2639\/2\/bukuputusanMARI.pdf<\/a>. )<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">Salam Pancasila<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">Fredrik J. Pinakunary<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>EKSEPSI KOMPETENSI PENGADILAN SEBAGAI ALASAN KASASI* Eksepsi Kompetensi Relatif Pengadilan Negeri oleh Pemohon Kasasi diajukan sebagai \u201cKeberatan Kasasi\u201d, karena hal tersebut telah dilanggar Judex facti. Keberatan ini tidak dapat diterima oleh Mahkamah Agung, dengan alasan: menurut Pasal 133 HIR, eksepsi tersebut harus diajukan pada jawaban Tergugat dalam sidang di Pengadilan Negeri. \u2192 Putusan Mahkamah Agung [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32147","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-artikel"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32147","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32147"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32147\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32149,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32147\/revisions\/32149"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32147"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32147"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32147"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}