{"id":30655,"date":"2021-11-01T11:23:27","date_gmt":"2021-11-01T04:23:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/?p=30655"},"modified":"2021-11-01T11:24:56","modified_gmt":"2021-11-01T04:24:56","slug":"pencerahan-hukum-hari-ini-senin-18-oktober-2021","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/pencerahan-hukum-hari-ini-senin-18-oktober-2021\/","title":{"rendered":"Pencerahan Hukum Hari Ini (Senin, 18 Oktober 2021)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL \u201cDIGUGAT BATAL\u201d \u2013 PERKARA PERTAMINA MELAWAN KARAHA BODAS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat tidak berwenang memeriksa dan memutus gugatan pembatalan \u201cPutusan Arbitrase Internasional\u201d karena menurut Pasal V ayat (1) huruf \u201ce\u201d Konvensi New York 1958, yang mengikat NKRI berdasarkan KEPPRES No.34\/1981 telah ditentukan bahwa pengadilan yang berwenang untuk memeriksa gugatan pembatalan \u201cPutusan Arbitrase Internasional\u201d adalah Pengadilan Negeri dimana Putusan Arbitrase itu dibuat. Dalam perkara ini adalah wewenang Mahkamah Agung Swiss karena Putusan Arbitrase diputus Majelis Hakim Negara Swiss.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.01\/Banding\/wasit-int\/2002, tanggal 8 Maret 2004<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Salam Pancasila,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Fredrik J. Pinakunary<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL \u201cDIGUGAT BATAL\u201d \u2013 PERKARA PERTAMINA MELAWAN KARAHA BODAS Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat tidak berwenang memeriksa dan memutus gugatan pembatalan \u201cPutusan Arbitrase Internasional\u201d karena menurut Pasal V ayat (1) huruf \u201ce\u201d Konvensi New York 1958, yang mengikat NKRI berdasarkan KEPPRES No.34\/1981 telah ditentukan bahwa pengadilan yang berwenang untuk memeriksa gugatan pembatalan \u201cPutusan Arbitrase [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[320],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30655","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pencerahan-hukum-hari-ini"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30655","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30655"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30655\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30656,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30655\/revisions\/30656"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30655"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30655"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30655"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}