{"id":29952,"date":"2020-06-30T15:39:03","date_gmt":"2020-06-30T08:39:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/?p=29952"},"modified":"2020-06-30T15:39:08","modified_gmt":"2020-06-30T08:39:08","slug":"bagaimana-kaidah-hukumnya-jika-terdapat-sertifikat-tanah-ganda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/bagaimana-kaidah-hukumnya-jika-terdapat-sertifikat-tanah-ganda\/","title":{"rendered":"Bagaimana Kaidah Hukumnya Jika Terdapat Sertifikat Tanah Ganda?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-text-align-justify wp-block-paragraph\">Mahkamah Agung telah menerapkan sikap hukum\nyang konsisten, bahwa Jika terdapat sertifikat ganda atas tanah yang\nsama,&nbsp;di mana keduanya sama-sama otentik&nbsp;maka bukti hak yang paling\nkuat adalah sertifikat hak yang terbit lebih dahulu. Salah satu putusan Mahkamah\nAgung terkait dengan sikap ini adalah dalam Putusan No. 967 K\/Pdt\/2015\ntertanggal 27 November 2015, di mana MA berpendapat:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>\u201c<em><strong>bahwa dalam menilai keabsahan salah satu dari 2 (dua) bukti hak yang bersifat otentik maka berlaku kaidah bahwa sertifikat hak yang terbit lebih awal adalah yang sah dan berkekuatan hukum<\/strong>.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-justify wp-block-paragraph\">kaidah yang\nsama juga diterapkan dalam Putusan MA lainnya, antara lain: No. 170 K\/Pdt\/2017 tertanggal 10 April 2017, Putusan No. 734 PK\/Pdt\/2017 tertanggal 19 Desember 2017, dan Putusan No. 1318 K\/Pdt\/2017 tertanggal 26 September 2017.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Semoga Bermanfaat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>FREDRIK J PINAKUNARY Law Offices<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mahkamah Agung telah menerapkan sikap hukum yang konsisten, bahwa Jika terdapat sertifikat ganda atas tanah yang sama,&nbsp;di mana keduanya sama-sama otentik&nbsp;maka bukti hak yang paling kuat adalah sertifikat hak yang terbit lebih dahulu. Salah satu putusan Mahkamah Agung terkait dengan sikap ini adalah dalam Putusan No. 967 K\/Pdt\/2015 tertanggal 27 November 2015, di mana MA [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[142],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29952","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-yurisprudensi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29952","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29952"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29952\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29953,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29952\/revisions\/29953"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29952"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29952"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fjp-law.com\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29952"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}